On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 15:25 +0800, Neo wrote: > I think it's very *stupid* of FC or Linux to require end users to > manually speicy the H/V refresh rates. On Windows, you never need to do > that. I think there must be a *safe* default rates for all monitors. > Linux developers perhaps don't know that. Of course they know that. That is why the installer offers "generic monitor that can do 1024x768" style options for people with monitors not specifically listed by the installer. The ability to specify the refresh rates is an *additional* facility to enable users to get the best results from their monitor rather than the lowest-common-denominator generic results. Paul. -- Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
