Re: NVIDIA driver *taints* kernel???

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 18:51 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> >> open source.
> >> 
> > Again you are so wrong.
> 
> What's wrong with supporting vendors that support open source?

If your talking about ATI ... from what I understand they don't give
specs for the R300 and newer cards (at least the 3D bits).

AFAIK there are no makers of high-end 3D cards that support open source,
the only ones with OS support are ones several generations old from ATI
and some "Entry Level" boards.  If all you are interested in doing with
the card is run older applications then that is fine.

If you are running heavy 3D modeling applications and current games,
then your choices are nVidia and ATI.  My personal experience the past
two years nVidia has had better performance and fewer OOPSs of the two
binary-only drivers.

If I could get open source support for the ATI X-?00 series with decent
performance and that supported most of the features of the card (add in
VIA/S3 allowing the DRI developers to use S3TC) then I would buy ATI.

Paul


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux