Enigma: yum check-update doesn\'t show all rpms in a repository

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\'t show all rpms in a repository
• From: pmconway <no-reply-gw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:02:22 +0100
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Reply-to: pmconway@xxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

When I point my browser to     
   http://limestone.uoregon.edu/ftp/fedora/updates/3/i386/

I see 
   alsa-lib-1.0.6-7.FC3.i386.rpm   19-Jan-2005 09:25  302K  

is available. But, in when the only repo I specify for yum is 
   http://limestone.uoregon.edu/ftp/fedora/updates/3/$ARCH/

yum's check-update response indicates no alsa rpms are available.  My references point to the SAME repository, true?  How can the results differ for the same repository - depending on whether my Firefox is looking or yum is looking?

Thank you.

Trish


-- 
This is an email sent via the webforum on http://fcp.homelinux.org

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\'t show all rpms in a repository
    • From: William Hooper
  • Re: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\'t show all rpms in a repository
    • From: Dennis Shaw

• Prev by Date: Re: Mouse and KVM
• Next by Date: Re: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\'t show all rpms in a repository
• Previous by thread: back to original problem - fs type usbdevfs not supported by kernel
• Next by thread: Re: Enigma: yum check-update doesn\'t show all rpms in a repository
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread