On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 04:53:56PM -0500, Scot L. Harris wrote: > > > > > Are there any national isps that are friendly to linux? > > > > Perhaps a more critical question is are there > > Home Firewall Friendly ISPs out there. ... > About the only issue I have seen that affects using a > NAT/router/firewall is when the ISP registers the MAC address of the > devices used on the connection. And most of the simple > NAT/router/firewalls have a fix for this, you can assign the MAC address > the NAT/router/firewall uses. Good point. I should log the MAC address so I have it if I need it. > As such it is not really worth the time to ask the ISP if they would > help installing such a device. Well perhaps it is. see below... > > IMO, It is near criminal to connect WindowZ directly to the internet. > > The same may be true of any OS depending on the current state of bugs > > and exploits. > > Agreed! :) It might be fun to ask the ISP if they would help installing such a device. When you get a serious dumb answer like "unsupported" or "unnecessary" send a 'letter of record' to the ISPs legal department. Thank them for the support and information and that you trust from their lack of support and or advice that this is unnecessary and that you are happy to let them assume partial liability for personal loss, identity theft, pain, suffering, inconvience and financial loss via the internet should their advice be in error. OK I am just kidding about the letter but any engineer has heard the marketing guys blather about lack of demand, lack of market, lack of value... Ask the question, click feedback on the help screens, give those marketing folks something to measure. If you ever need to break an agreement with an ISP the lack of support for a 'common consumer firewall/ security' product could/ should be sufficent cause. ;-) -- T o m M i t c h e l l spam unwanted email. SPAM, good eats, and a trademark of Hormel Foods.
