On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 17:41, Johnathan Bailes wrote: > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:53:59 -0800 (PST), Joel Jaeggli > <joelja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2005, Trevor Smith wrote: > > > > > > look at nfs or smb, the mac can do either as can your linux box. nfs your > > generally wantto secure in someway when running it in a public environment > > such as tunneling it over ssh. > > > > nfs would be the old-school unix style choice but unless you secure > nfs its not really that safe over wireless. > > Heck, its the only reason I suggested samba. > > tcp/wrappers. What is the consensus? Is that really enough to > "secure" traditional unix services like nfs or (god forbid!) nis? Actually I would look into tunneling nfs over ssh. And I would use samba only if I wanted to work with windows systems. -- Scot L. Harris webid@xxxxxxxxxx "The lymbic system in my brain is so electrically active, it qualifies as a third brain. Normal humans have two brains, left and right. - Jeff Merkey
