On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 11:55, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Sa, den 15.01.2005 schrieb Thomas E. Dukes um 18:43: > > > > And for what reason did you create that anyway? It is not > > > necessary - at least I do not see any difference from letting > > > the route being automatically made from the network scripts > > > based on the data in the > > > ifcfg-eth1 config file. So remote the static routes file. > > > > > OK, how do I do that? Why aren't the scripts doing it? I'm not sure I > > understand. > > What do you not understand? I said delete the static-routes files. It is > neither necessary, nor has a valid syntax. The route is set up by simply > having a proper ifcfg-eth1 file, like: > > $ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 If he doesn't know about the file, it was probably created by filling out the form in 'system-config-network' and it should be possible to get rid of it the same way. Normally you don't need per-interface routes unless there are other routers that you can only reach through certain interfaces. If you only have one router, setting the default route takes care of it. -- Les Mikesell les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
