> Subject: RE: Static routes file > > Am Sa, den 15.01.2005 schrieb Thomas E. Dukes um 18:14: > > > Its contents are: > > > > eth1 net 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw > > And for what reason did you create that anyway? It is not > necessary - at least I do not see any difference from letting > the route being automatically made from the network scripts > based on the data in the > ifcfg-eth1 config file. So remote the static routes file. > OK, how do I do that? Why aren't the scripts doing it? I'm not sure I understand. TIA
