Am Sa, den 15.01.2005 schrieb Thomas E. Dukes um 18:14: > Its contents are: > > eth1 net 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw And for what reason did you create that anyway? It is not necessary - at least I do not see any difference from letting the route being automatically made from the network scripts based on the data in the ifcfg-eth1 config file. So remote the static routes file. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.10-1.9_FC2smp Serendipity 18:31:59 up 1 day, 1:54, load average: 0.06, 0.16, 0.13
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
