On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 11:14 -0500, Kiryl Hakhovich wrote: > m g wrote: > > >>Unfortunately, that stability is gone. > >> > >> > > > >If you want RHEL or Debian Stable, you know where to find them. > > > > > Guys, > you got to be kidding me. > > i thought i have made it clear - FC1 and FC2 was a lot more stable and > what we call Linux systems that prove that they work better. > > As of now FC3 - seems to me the worst out of 3 releases. ok!? > And why is that? I consider myself a power user, and have been using linux for over 10 years. FC3 is by far the best distro I have tried (I have stayed with the RH line mostly). I have it running 24 hours a day, never have to reboot (except to activate the kernel updates), and have never had a single crash or instability. Yes, when I add new hardware (Like scanner, etc) I have to locate/install drivers, and configure things, but as yet I have not tried a device that I cannot get to work. > Example NetworkManager - WTF!? when it's running FC3 hardly get's IP > address. after you stop it - it's all cool. This kind of little things > are all over the place. > IIRC NetworkManager is a 3rd party package. You certainly cannot blame Fedora for problems with other packages. > Now the test phase has been finished for FC3 - and i don't even think of > posting anything to bugzilla. > (if i would be a beta user then it's a different story) > If you refuse to post a problem to bugzilla then you hardly qualify to complain about something that either is not a problem for others or that has been handled in other ways than complaining on this list. If it isn't reported it isn't a bug. If it isn't reported, how can you expect anyone to know what the problem you see is, or take action to fix it? > I hope this makes it clear my point and where i'm going with it. > > Thanks. > > PS. again - it was clean install, updates constantly installed, and > kernel updates are not as upgrades but only as addition to the system, > so i can roll over to the old kernel. > Common guys, do not try to make end-user out of me :-) be serious here. >
