Re: FC3 - i'm disapointed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If you can't figure that out from this - you NEVER will.

Craig

On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 17:05 -0600, Erich Noll wrote:
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Tony Dietrich <td@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Sent: Jan 13, 2005 4:24 PM
> >To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: FC3 - i'm disapointed
> >
> >On Thursday 13 Jan 2005 22:12, Jeff Vian wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 14:59 -0700, Guy Fraser wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2005-13-01 at 12:24 -0700, Kevin Fries wrote:
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > >
> > > > > Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
> > > > > | Hey Brian,
> > > > > |
> > > > > | i have been testing it on :
> > > > > |    - Toshiba Laptop Satellite 2805-S401 (P III , 256 RAM)
> > > > > |    - Desktop Dell Optiplex GX110 (P III, 128 RAM)
> > > > > |
> > > > > | Both worked absolutely fine out of the box with installation of FC1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, try to bottom post.  Top posting is truly annoyning, this is not
> > > > > Jepardy where you get the answer first then assertain the question.
> > > >
> > > > Bull.
> > > > Only Type A whackos care.
> > > > Take some valium.
> > >
> > > Guy,
> > > Take some valium yourself.
> > >
> > > No need to restart the flame war about top/bottom posting.
> > >
> > > IMHO, Kevin's suggestion mirrors the desires of the majority on this
> > > list.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> 
> >It may mirror the desires of the majority.
> >
> > My **only** thought on this is that *repeated* top-posters deserve Kevin's 
> > admonition.  If Kevin has seen this poster top-posting, regularly (I haven't 
> > looked), then great.
> 
> > If not .. give the poster a chance.  I'm guilty of not thinking sometimes, and 
> > top-posting, especially if I've come from a list where the norm IS 
> > top-posting.  I think I've even sent one tonight to this list top-posted by 
> > mistake.  Repeated top-posting .. ask or flame.  But mistakes happen.
> 
> > If this starts another discussion, then fine.  Nothing should *ever* be 
> > written in stone, and the population of this list is volatile enough that 
> > anything that raised the blood pressure of one generation of subscribers 
> > should be raised again and again to allow the majority to air their view ... 
> > and make sure that the majority view hasn't changed.  Otherwise we get a 
> > situation where the one that shouts loudest (or even the only one that 
> > bothers shouting!) wins , rather than a true majority.
> 
> > -- 
> > Tony Dietrich
> > -------------
> > Grandpa Charnock's Law:
> > You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive.
> 
> > [I thought it was when your kids learned to drive.  Ed.]
> 
> > -- 
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> 
> > > > On Thu, 2005-13-01 at 12:24 -0700, Kevin Fries wrote:
> > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > >
> > > > > Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
> > > > > | Hey Brian,
> > > > > |
> > > > > | i have been testing it on :
> > > > > |    - Toshiba Laptop Satellite 2805-S401 (P III , 256 RAM)
> > > > > |    - Desktop Dell Optiplex GX110 (P III, 128 RAM)
> > > > > |
> > > > > | Both worked absolutely fine out of the box with installation of
> FC1.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, try to bottom post.  Top posting is truly annoyning, 
> 
> Here's a dumb question from someone who never knows when 
> to leave well-enough alone:  Someone, I suppose Kevin Fries, said
> top posting is really annoying but now that I know what top posting is:
> 
> why it is truly annoying?
> 


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux