On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 11:22, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 11:13 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Shouldn't an ATI Rage Pro with 4 Megs on board be able to do 1280x768 > > resolution? The highest I can get the display setup GUI to offer > > is 1152x864 which seems like an odd setting? > > > > Normal screen resolutions have a 4:3 proportion. 1152x864 is a normal > resolution, just like 800x600 and 640x480. All of those are 4:3. > > The resolution you suggest (1280x768) is a wide-screen resolution with > 5:3 proportions. I've never seen a display with those proportions, but > if you actually have a screen that will display such a resolution then > yes, a 4MB display should be able to drive that resolution with at least > 16-bit color. Sorry, the resolution I meant to say was 1280x1024, which I thought the box would do under windows. -- Les Mikesell les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
