On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:52:21PM -0800, Max Kanat-Alexander wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 22:23 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > The above sounds as if ATrpms is a use-alone repo, while it's > > fedora.us that chose to live inside walls :( > > > > (Max, I know you didn't mean it that way, but it may be read so :) > > I totally understand. > > Well, I might phrase it as "ATrpms and fedora.us did not come to an > agreement about conflicts and naming." :-) Well, it's worse than that, there wasn't any attempt to do so, since this is against the still current fedora.us' menifesto. :( > But you're still right -- I didn't mean to shine any bad light on > you at all, Axel. I really appreciate all the work you do; I use > your packages on a *lot* of my systems. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpbXGzvbnZcW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
