On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 22:23 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > The above sounds as if ATrpms is a use-alone repo, while it's > fedora.us that chose to live inside walls :( > > (Max, I know you didn't mean it that way, but it may be read so :) I totally understand. Well, I might phrase it as "ATrpms and fedora.us did not come to an agreement about conflicts and naming." :-) But you're still right -- I didn't mean to shine any bad light on you at all, Axel. I really appreciate all the work you do; I use your packages on a *lot* of my systems. -Max
