Axel Thimm wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:34:26AM -0500, Neal D. Becker wrote: >> Axel Thimm wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 09:54:13AM -0500, Neal D. Becker wrote: >> >> I really appreciate atrpms. I do have 1 issue with them (at least, >> >> IIRC is is ATrpms that have this problem). >> >> >> >> Since I'm using x86_64, I often need to build from srpms. >> > >> > ATrpms does have x86_64 support for FC2 and FC3. >> >> Yeah, it does _now_ :) > > ? It has since May 2004. In fact all build boxes used for ATrpms are > Dual-Opterons running FC2/x86_86/smp or FC3/x86_86/smp. :) In that case, accept my apology. I must be thinking of something else.