Re: ATrpms Real Issues

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: ATrpms Real Issues
• From: "Neal D. Becker" <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:54:13 -0500
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Sender: news <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KNode/0.8.2

I really appreciate atrpms.  I do have 1 issue with them (at least, IIRC is
is ATrpms that have this problem).

Since I'm using x86_64, I often need to build from srpms.  It seems that
at-srpms often contain some macros that are not standard on Fedora?  I
think I need to install something to fix this, but I never found out what.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: ATrpms Real Issues
    • From: Axel Thimm

• References:
  • ATrpms Real Issues
    • From: Temlakos

• Prev by Date: Re: How do you know?
• Next by Date: Re: How do you know?
• Previous by thread: Re: ATrpms Real Issues
• Next by thread: Re: ATrpms Real Issues
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread