Re: mplayer

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: mplayer
• From: M Daniel R M <danes16subscrip3@xxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 00:23:33 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> To whoever said that yum was too slow to use compared to apt, have you tried
> yum-2.1.x (i.e. the yum in FC3)?  It is <tons> better than the yum in FC2
> (2.0.x).
> 

I've also noticed that... Surprised when running yum in FC3 ...
cleanness & speedy!

Cheers

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: mplayer
    • From: Chadley Wilson

• References:
  • mplayer
    • From: Jim
  • Re: mplayer
    • From: nix4me
  • Re: mplayer
    • From: Jim
  • Re: mplayer
    • From: Alexander Dalloz
  • Re: mplayer
    • From: Jim
  • Re: mplayer
    • From: Kam Leo
  • Re: mplayer
    • From: Christopher J. Bottaro

• Prev by Date: Re: Firefox FTP problem
• Next by Date: Re: state of eclipse gcj gtk swt efforts ?
• Previous by thread: Re: yum question
• Next by thread: Re: mplayer
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread