Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Rakotomandimby \(R12y\) Mihamina" <mihamina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:14:17 -0600
Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <1104482438.930.6.camel@ngeza>
References: <1104434160.856.28.camel@ngeza> <[email protected]> <1104482438.930.6.camel@ngeza>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 09:40:38 +0100,
  "Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina" <mihamina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> In fact I would need recent version of a LAMP server + mail (SMTP+IMAP)
> server.

Unless you are having a specific problem, FC2 should be fine for this.

References:
- Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
  - From: Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
- Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
  - From: Bruno Wolff III
- Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
  - From: Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina

Prev by Date: Re: new kernel but doesn\\\\\\\'t show up in grub at system boot
Next by Date: Re: question about ssh
Previous by thread: Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
Next by thread: Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]