Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3

• To: "Rakotomandimby \(R12y\) Mihamina" <mihamina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
• From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx>
• Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:14:17 -0600
• Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• In-reply-to: <1104482438.930.6.camel@ngeza>
• References: <1104434160.856.28.camel@ngeza> <[email protected]> <1104482438.930.6.camel@ngeza>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 09:40:38 +0100,
  "Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina" <mihamina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> In fact I would need recent version of a LAMP server + mail (SMTP+IMAP)
> server.

Unless you are having a specific problem, FC2 should be fine for this.

• References:
  • Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
    • From: Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
  • Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
    • From: Bruno Wolff III
  • Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
    • From: Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina

• Prev by Date: Re: new kernel but doesn\\\\\\\'t show up in grub at system boot
• Next by Date: Re: question about ssh
• Previous by thread: Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
• Next by thread: Re: Average succes rate FC2 -> FC3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread