Issue on the relationship of the three rpms

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Issue on the relationship of the three rpms
• From: Park Lee <parklee_sel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 22:34:30 -0800 (PST)
• Cc: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=CZdIYR6JfsZD5w+UkYt8Ezalkn6I6O3JCs6QD365kxx+BZ7+WQN0540swpt0F7fpZaA15pcx1lVWZHKeuEY/3Rmj0Fyc1OVoa1taa8cJruo2NgJVkSxieaRQDa1gXllKrEDaf//WnpK33K1RwhH36poJP3fmYi+gM9/Sl0D909Q= ;
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi,
  In fedora/linux/core/updates/2/SRPMS/, we can see
there is a kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2.src.rpm, while, in
fedora/linux/core/updates/2/i386/, there also is a
kernel-sourcecode-2.6.9-1.6_FC2.noarch.rpm.
  Since these two rpms both contain kernel source,
What is the difference with the two?
  And, What's the relationship between them and
kernel-2.6.9-1.6_FC2.i686.rpm ?

  Thanks a lot.

  

=====
Best Regards,
Park Lee


		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Issue on the relationship of the three rpms
    • From: Matthew Saltzman

• Prev by Date: Badness in interruptible_sleep_on_timeout
• Next by Date: Is a filesystem check really necessary?
• Previous by thread: Badness in interruptible_sleep_on_timeout
• Next by thread: Re: Issue on the relationship of the three rpms
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread