On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 08:12, Bill Gradwohl wrote: > Paul Flanders wrote: > > >I have many RH9 servers running and need to upgrade, i have been putting > >in FC1 servers as 'i feel' it seems bit safer knowing that FC1 was very > >stable has lots of updates and runs well on DELL servers and after the > >hassle with FC2 (ended up going back to FC1) and FC3 (can not get samba > >working fully 'dont ask!') I think at the moment ill stick to RH9 and > >FC1. The "legacy" 15-18 month business is a bit worrying especially if > >the FC versions cycle out very quickly. I may look at RH Enterprise but > >there is a cost to it. I manage over 50 RH servers and i really dont > >like the idea of upgrading them all to often especially when so much > >seems to break between versions. > > > > > We've got lots of FC2 servers running in production at client sites, and > just recently did an FC3 with seventeen 400Gig (Data) and two 40GIG 17??? Wow.. WHat sort of box is that? 4U or just normal white boxes? Those must be Maxtor Drives. > > We use nothing but ASUS mainboards and 3WARE controllers, BTW, does anyone has any recommendation on Mainboards? Experience with TYAN mainboards? I read a review on (somewhere) on the tyan mainboard and it's 2 on-board GIG ethernet. That got my blood all fired up. (Over here, locallly, can't seem to find any of those 4in1 PCI ethernet controller) -- Ow Mun Heng Gentoo/Linux on D600 1.4Ghz 98% Microsoft(tm) Free!! Neuromancer 10:07:00 up 1:00, 4 users, 0.09, 0.20, 0.39
