And just because you mentioned it ed, i will figure out a reproducible test. Quoting Ed Hill <ed@xxxxxxx>: > On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:09 -0500, Sundara Pandian wrote: > > All, > > This is a general request to Fedora developers and administrators, > > Pl work on improving the performance of the OS, We were very disappointed > in > > the > > core 3 performance, We have core 3 , suse9.1 and redhat es running on 3 > seperate > > machines with same hardware. > > Core 3 is almost twice as slow as suse9.1 in terms of performance (boot, > > > Hi Sundara, > > Like a lot of Free and Open Source software, Fedora is a *community* > project. So in some very real sense you're much more likely to get more > out of it if you can figure out how to put something useful into it. > > In that spirit, could you describe which benchmarks you've run and what > the results were? For instance, what basis are you using to decide that > FC3 is "almost twice as slow"? > > If you'd really like to see this issue addressed, then you should create > a *reproducible* benchmark that measures the things you care about and > then work with people to figure out how to improve performance on that > benchmark. > > Ed > > -- > Edward H. Hill III, PhD > office: MIT Dept. of EAPS; Rm 54-1424; 77 Massachusetts Ave. > Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 > emails: eh3@xxxxxxx ed@xxxxxxx > URLs: http://web.mit.edu/eh3/ http://eh3.com/ > phone: 617-253-0098 > fax: 617-253-4464 > > -- > fedora-list mailing list > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > ================== #!/usr/bin/perl ================== Sundara Pandian ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
