-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 20 December 2004 17:31, Ed Hill wrote: > In that spirit, could you describe which benchmarks you've run and what > the results were? For instance, what basis are you using to decide that > FC3 is "almost twice as slow"? Also the exact machine details it was tried on might be interesting, I would think. - -Andy - -- http://www.addintelligence.co.uk -- we design custom hardware and software for your products -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBxxAFjKeDCxMJCTIRAqKbAJ9ERBRQCOft6YWHNiN+Pr2c8iebGACfQLJQ 9Ca6BGUOLY0MnSi+dWMlbS4= =RIiD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
