On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:14:46AM -0500, William Hooper wrote: > Axel Thimm said: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 09:18:17AM -0500, William Hooper wrote: > > > >>> Error: Missing Dependency: /etc/yum.conf is needed by > >>> package yum > >> > >> atrpms chooses to package yum.conf seperate from yum. Not sure why the > >> package the provides it isn't getting pulled in (unless you have > >> excluded it). IIRC there was some talk of a yum issue with some file > >> deps, but I'm not seeing it in yum's bugzilla right off. > > > > It's in > > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=288 > > Last time I check yum's bugzilla was at > https://devel.linux.duke.edu/bugzilla/ True, but users file bugs against what they consider relevant at that time (bugzilla.redhat.com is probably where most of the yum bugsa re reported against). Some users wanted to file also against yum's bugzilla, don't know whether they finally did. At any rate the yum author is aware of this, and hopefully one of the next yum releases will have this fixed. > >>> Error: Missing Dependency: libFLAC++.so.2 is needed by package > >>> k3b > >> > >> This appears to be provided by Fedora Core's flac package, but not > >> atrpms flac package. > [snip] > > The provides above _are_ in ATrpms, but yum cannot resolve them: > > > > > > rpm -q --whatprovides libFLAC++.so.2 libFLAC.so.4 > > libFLAC++2-1.1.0-4.1.rhfc3.at > > libFLAC4-1.1.0-4.1.rhfc3.at > > Thanks, I missed those. They don't appear to be listed at > http://atrpms.net/dist/fc3/flac/ . These wouldn't belong there as these are compatibility packages for older flac. The compatibility packages are in http://atrpms.net/dist/fc3/compat/ The idea is to not have to lookup the package at all manually (unless the package resolver fails ...) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpxEH2CQRTbc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
