Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
From: Steve Bergman <steve@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 15:00:10 -0600
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127)

Tim Waugh wrote:

So it's a simple choice really.

Sounds like it is a simple choice for me too then. Thanks for the very useful information.

-Steve

References:
- Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: Steve Bergman
- Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
  - From: Tim Waugh

Prev by Date: Fedora Core Installation question
Next by Date: Re: Fedora Core Installation question
Previous by thread: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
Next by thread: Re: Why the switch from TightVNC to RealVNC?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux