On Tuesday 07 December 2004 22:30, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > Hmmm... Too bad. Grub is nice, but for simple things such as servers, > it is total overkill. IMHO, LILO is much more suitable for that kind of > environment. I recently had to repair a server that had partly-installed Debian on hda, RHL 7.0 on hdb and wouldn't boot either. My rescue disk (FC2 I think) didn't work. Knoppix didn't work I eventually settled on a grub floppy. Worked perfectly and I was able to make both bootable. > BTW, while we are at servers and Grub vs LILO, has anybody here > attempted to use Grub on serial console? Is that possible at all, and > how usable it is? I've done it; it's fine if you're wired up. > > While Grub has more options and is more configurable it is also much > more complex. If you don't know anything about LILO, man page will get > you going in couple of minutes. If you don't know anything about Grub, > you are likely to spend much more time reading man pages and Googling > around, before you will be able to make simple configuration and place > Grub on the boot sector (provided you are doing this by hand, not by > letting Anaconda or RPM postinstall scripts do "dirty" job for you). when Lilo says LI you're in deep poo. Can't get to the manuals, gotta rescue the system with a boot floppy (do they still work?) (one of my system has no floppy) or CD (several have no CD drive, only three have burners). Once installed grub basically works for ever. If you stuff up the menu, you have a commandline and some basic docs. grub for servers. -- Cheers John Summerfield tourist pics: http://environmental.disaster.cds.merseine.nu/
