On Tuesday 07 December 2004 18:00, Thomas Cameron wrote: > The first time someone fires up 'yum update,' they will find that their > e-mail traffic is just a drop in the bandwidth bucket. The argument > about HTML mail taking up too much space/bandwidth just don't hold up > any more. Relative to web browsing and software updates, e-mail is > inconsequential. I can choose or to run "yum update" or not; if I choose to do so, it's because I expect some benefit to me from doing so. In fact, I've not done so because my FC system is currently not important enough to me. On the other hand, I - and many others - volunteer our time. We have asked for people to _not_ post HTML to this list, for reasons that seem good to us. I have no concerns about HTML between consenting adults, but I do not consent. -- Cheers John Summerfield tourist pics: http://environmental.disaster.cds.merseine.nu/
