On Tuesday 07 December 2004 09:57, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Rus's is the standard way, and RH used to do it that way. Then it decided > > to be different. > > is this "standard" document anywhere. there is a difference between > standard and convention There are both formal and informal standards. Either way, my choice of words is appropriate. http://www.linuxvoodoo.com/resources/guides/nag2/x-087-2-uucp.config.files.html http://k12linux.org/network.html For some time this was _the_ source of wisdom on networking Linux. I had tbe book before I every used Linux. http://www.cs.indiana.edu/linux/net/nag.html As I said before, Red Hat used to do it that way too. Doing it differently leads to confusion as we've already seen. -- Cheers John Summerfield tourist pics: http://environmental.disaster.cds.merseine.nu/
