What have you heard ? I've been using 4.1.x for quite some time: 100,000,000+ records, 500 GB, etc etc. somedays over 2,000,000 inserts, 1,000,000 deletes. The only thing I've heard about it being buggy is from a Oracle sales moron. On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:00, Tom Coburn wrote: > besides, mysql 4 is buggy anyway I hear... > not interested in PHP 5 either because I hear I would have to rewrite > all my code for PHP 5, esp in object oriented programs. least thats > what I hear anyway. > > > On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 14:59:36 -0500, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:35:55AM -0800, Mike Ramirez wrote: > > > If you search the archives of the list you will fin that this question > > > has been asked atleast 3 times and the answer is Licensing Issues. 4 is > > > under a whole new licensing from mysql. Redhat lawyers and mysql > > > lawyers are still working out the details. IDK of ETA on this. > > > > MySQL 4.1.7 is in rawhide (the development tree) right now. So I assume we > > figure Fedora Core 4 -- this spring -- as an ETA. > > > > -- > > Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> > > Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> > > > > -- > > fedora-list mailing list > > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list > >
