Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan)
From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 06:45:17 +0530
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=YuIsaInLUEZ0G62ddt2cENnQZascZnTUoidQJLF1IAarC9ilfmSrlRabqFwVzFrLGDsFYvgWRlwSzzZdm2pdzpR0nnDFhl4qIOVmdXG76YYkl+kpqGBYDa1revO6q3U2tj74cW45drcKU9j1O4GOhDlzo4jQORGYIs2iWI59Oks=
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <027501c4d741$bf5c4d80$0201a8c0@ladybug> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi


> Its a false positive. Lame tools just checking for application version
> numbers bring lame results. 

whats the alternative?

-- 
Regards,
Rahul Sundaram

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan)
  - From: Alexander Dalloz

References:
- LKM Trojan
  - From: david walcroft
- Re: LKM Trojan
  - From: Pedro Fernandes Macedo
- Re: LKM Trojan
  - From: Rahul Sundaram
- OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan)
  - From: scootgirl.com
- Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan)
  - From: Alexander Dalloz

Prev by Date: Re: change cyrus-imapd ssl certificate FC3
Next by Date: Re: Fedora Extras is extra
Previous by thread: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan)
Next by thread: Re: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]