Re: LKM Trojan

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LKM Trojan
From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 05:52:17 +0530
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=DqkoULw7pBubb1NpOqKW0pSxhZb9k2OZnW7aywoCd83cukq9Amk9OFU4GAlQQeDfR3ckk9b+TcPv8vllV5uDVYwColDYW55rPEi6kSY4TWMjI4GsSTxKgcC270wVdHD50d11JO8cp6u0me/INW0T9TfmtAiAQko/rRAjn64ZIMc=
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Reply-to: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi


> I used to have lots of false positives , so I just quit using chkrootkit
> (as my machine isnt all that sensitive and I secured it the best I can..)..
> 

rkhunter (ww.rootkit.nl) can be a  nice alternative

-- 
Regards,
Rahul Sundaram

Follow-Ups:
- OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan)
  - From: scootgirl.com

References:
- LKM Trojan
  - From: david walcroft
- Re: LKM Trojan
  - From: Pedro Fernandes Macedo

Prev by Date: Re: LKM Trojan
Next by Date: PAM and USB devices
Previous by thread: Re: LKM Trojan
Next by thread: OpenSSL 0.9.7a seems to be vulnerable (was: Re: LKM Trojan)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Current Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora Docs]