On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 12:43, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:00:27 -0800, Mike Ramirez <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 11:10, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > In > > > fact, i believe such testing is a waste of limited resources that > > > could be used for other purposes. > > > > > > Hi Jeff > > > > I think you answered my why question and can agree with you an almost > > everything said. This here I think is wrong. This testing is necessary > > or we will always have this same problem. I think a compromise must be > > made in this area to have cross compatibility between all repos for a > > better user experience. > All repos? ALL REPOS? thats a very very big number. I understand that but it brings you the resources you need. You say the resources are limited, you need them from somewhere? All I read was an excuse as not to do it. We don't need excuses anymore but an answer. Is yours the best I don't know. Hopefully with enough replies we will find out. I might be thought of an idiot for this past post. But the goal is to find the best answer possible. I definitely don't have a full one but an Idea and if you can't do it with your available resources you need them from somewhere, I'm just trying to help you find them with whats available. Egos need to be checked and an answer found IMO. We should be open to all solutions and not think ours is the best. Two build machines for how many thousands of extra packages? Is that really a doable situation? Its Ideal yeah but is more than that? I don't know. The number of packages that would need to be done just doesn't seem like its really possible. I'm just trying to provide a solution that will help everyone. It may not be the right one but hopefully it pushes one that works and satisfies everyone involved. -- Mike Ramirez <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
