On Die, 2004-11-30 at 15:31 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
> Having reverse DNS with a non-generic-looking name is also a good way of
> demonstrating that the IPs are static rather than dynamic.
I have that.
> Last week, over on SPAM-L, an Israeli ISP listed their dynamic IP range and
> *requested* that everyone block it until they could get their outgoing port 25
> block in place.
Great, what does this prove?
> As the OP actually has a static IP, the real solution for that should be to
> get the incorrect listings fixed, rather than stopping using dynamic IP lists
> altogether.
It would be more useful to implement SPF and block every domain that
does not designate senders.
Tom
--
T h o m a s Z e h e t b a u e r ( TZ251 )
PGP encrypted mail preferred - KeyID 96FFCB89
finger thomasz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx for key
Nirvana: Zustand des Gluecks durch Ausloeschung des Selbst.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
