Re: What happened to gqview

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: What happened to gqview
• From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 00:37:43 +0530
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=BWXY8soC/+DtEauP4SJy0eNQXKMDbuJ80D69nMSeHZTEhwafBPO70TOBZeVgM87JAEImGBY1MUVmTLvz/61eoWEZPoNYJI4Sfp+KVzxLTqqJNLDuZQ91dch9kucWCDyJx78n910eBRAN5T8ehjv04NGfASM0njI/C70bHzxJJt0=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi


> > solely a Redhat developer decision...  There always will be software
> 
> Welcome to the Fedora Community Process. :)


Everyone including redhat developers have agreed that fedora is not
yet open to the community input. fedora extras is about to be
launched. we can start moving ahead from there.


-- 
Regards,
Rahul Sundaram

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: What happened to gqview
    • From: William Hooper
  • Re: What happened to gqview
    • From: Matthew Miller

• References:
  • What happened to gqview
    • From: Guy Fraser
  • Re: What happened to gqview
    • From: Dexter Ang
  • Re: What happened to gqview
    • From: tom
  • Re: What happened to gqview
    • From: Rahul Sundaram
  • Re: What happened to gqview
    • From: Ernie McCracken
  • Re: What happened to gqview
    • From: Rahul Sundaram
  • Re: What happened to gqview
    • From: Matthew Miller

• Prev by Date: Re: 32 bit or 64 bit?
• Next by Date: Re: OT: fighting rbl's
• Previous by thread: Re: What happened to gqview
• Next by thread: Re: What happened to gqview
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread