Am Di, den 30.11.2004 schrieb John Summerfield um 0:14: > On Tuesday 30 November 2004 01:08, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > "localhost" is no valid network hostname. > > localhost is a perfectly valid host name and is _the standard_ namd for the > computer the program is running on. > John As an addition to my other reply to your mail: you took out my words from their context! This is at least unfair. --- quote from my reply to Bruce and his question quoted --- > But is that all I need? Do I need to give different computers different > names? They can't all be local.localhost, right? Does that mean I need > a DNS? "localhost" is no valid network hostname. It is very trivial (with each --- end of quote --- I feel the context gives my statement a very different bias. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.9-1.6_FC2smp Serendipity 00:33:24 up 9 days, 19:20, load average: 1.18, 1.29, 0.96
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
