Re: SATA + FEDORA CORE 2/3

• To: Raghu Vadapalli <iprsvp@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: SATA + FEDORA CORE 2/3
• From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:47:29 +0530
• Cc:
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=uGOr9KLtPEc4p/awUxw2lQn3kjLtdSO9Sjha3ljuKxki4Nfw3+dV+uGppkM6uZM13vus0u0ANIBW6LckZpZXv0ceWMb7I4MRj0GizRLPwEXWfsJPVTmy/90z+/OReUuR07pO923JerVmqcPw+p5TYHh5g5ACO5yu4hp4ntBq8ww=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:09:26 -0500, Raghu Vadapalli <iprsvp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> do they go together or not. I see many things on this list about SATA
> problems. ?  Am I mistaken ?
> 

there are known bugs and a new kernel is being currently tested. read
the devel mailing list archives for details
 
-- 
Regards,
Rahul Sundaram

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SATA + FEDORA CORE 2/3
    • From: Raghu Vadapalli

• References:
  • SATA + FEDORA CORE 2/3
    • From: Raghu Vadapalli

• Prev by Date: Re: system-config-securitylevel python error
• Next by Date: Re: Yum and SRPMS
• Previous by thread: SATA + FEDORA CORE 2/3
• Next by thread: Re: SATA + FEDORA CORE 2/3
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread