On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, William Hooper wrote: > Bryan J. Smith said: > > P.S. And not to throw any bigotry into the questions, hence why this is > > a "P.S.," but I haven't seen a good explanation on why YUM is getting > > preference over APT in current Red Hat Fedora moves? > > APT has never been part of Fedora Core and has always been an "Extra". > I'm sure as soon as Fedora Extras for FC3 get up they will include a > package for APT. Also - does APT support the new metadata format? Or is this a yum only thing - which apt will never support? (I thought the new format was a common thing for all tools) Satish
