On Friday 19 November 2004 23:02, Frank Pineau wrote: > Yeah, that'd be nice too, except I'm in the field more often than not > and getting a VPN connection through a NAT/PAT firewall is dicey at > best. Even worse when it's never the same firewall two days in a row. > I find it's easier to just tunnel the ports I need over SSH. As soon as > my network comes up, the tunnels get created and I never even have to > think about it. A mate of mine uses port 80:-) openvpn defaults to UDP port 5000; motly higher-numbred ports are open (otherwise traceroute doesn't work so well). -- Cheers John
