Re: evolution 1.4 -> 2.0?

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: evolution 1.4 -> 2.0?
• From: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 04:42:49 +0530
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=grNiJ/oo6pp5QFaMxRx0v2qsLwKC25LPsMQMjM7R8rT4c5/zOSVeOlFqj//Lq/cOcbidti+P9kkjBK3G30aQdh96sJ8aWj6f6ncrTo66qbydJSWM2dpXuQaecqq2jXqoEFIR1Pvkoea1tk1EF5useyjrlpvddVK4G//4gkwSyO0=
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: Rahul Sundaram <rahulsundaram@xxxxxxxxx>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi

> current ~, if evolution 2 would have had asked at first launch to
> migrate the contents and settings of that folder by itself (without
> having to use gconf first)?
> because if not, would hardly call that "userfriendly"!

yes. it would have automatically done everything as required

-- 
Regards,
Rahul Sundaram

• References:
  • evolution 1.4 -> 2.0?
    • From: Tim Kossack
  • Re: evolution 1.4 -> 2.0?
    • From: Rahul Sundaram
  • Re: evolution 1.4 -> 2.0?
    • From: Paul Howarth
  • Re: evolution 1.4 -> 2.0?
    • From: Tim Kossack

• Prev by Date: TwinView on Fedora Core 3
• Next by Date: Re: TwinView on Fedora Core 3
• Previous by thread: Re: evolution 1.4 -> 2.0?
• Next by thread: Re: evolution 1.4 -> 2.0?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread