Am Fr, den 19.11.2004 schrieb John Burton um 0:45: > the communication clearer. If you can see the intent of the message when > you open it, great (significant trimming, bottom posting, insertions, > etc). If you have to scroll through endless pages of untrimmed posting > just to get to a 1 line "I agree", or "Good Point", or even "Oops, the > correct URL is..." then perhaps bottom posting is not the way to go. > John And exactly that is an imminent point of critics: with top-posting people think they do not need to trim their quotes. It is often enough a pain to get 1 line added by top-posting and then have to go through a hundreds of lines of previous postings to see to which part it the comment fits. As you vote so clearly for communication aspects, then I guess you can agree such posting style is contra-productive. Alexander > > ______________________________________________________________________ -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp Serendipity 00:58:31 up 1 day, 2:44, load average: 0.35, 0.48, 0.62
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
