Am Mo, den 15.11.2004 schrieb Wong Kwok-hon um 8:57: > > > [livna-stable] > > > name=Livna.org - Fedora Compatible Packages (stable) > > > baseurl=http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/$releasever/$basearch/yum/stable > > > http://livna.cat.pdx.edu/fedora/$releasever/$basearch/yum/stable > > > #gpgcheck=1 > > > > So for "livna-stable" alone it has to be: > > > > For yum >= 2.1.3 (using new yum repository style with metadata), add the following to your /etc/yum.conf file: > > > > ### And then add these lines to access rpm.livna.org repositories: > > [livna-stable] > > name=Livna.org Fedora Compatible Packages (stable) > > baseurl= http://rpm.livna.org/fedora/$releasever/$basearch/RPMS.stable > > gpgcheck=1 > Is it affect the response when the gpg check is on ? I don't really understand your question. Do you mean the difference between the two yum.conf repository settings regarding the "gpgcheck" which for the first is disabled and with the example from the rpm.livna.org page is enabled? This difference does not cause the error Timothy is asking for. But you should not disable the GPG check - it is a feature for security. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | new address - new key: 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) on Athlon kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp Serendipity 18:21:02 up 26 days, 16:00, load average: 0.28, 0.27, 0.19
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
