----- Original Message ----- From: "Satish Balay" <balay@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: USB HD not detected in FC3
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Martin Sandaas wrote:
Does the above mean anything to anyone? How can I get back my usbdrive? The settings in modprobe.conf is default to the same as I had in FC2, and there it worked:
alias usb-controller uhci-hcd
The external disc is connected to an USB 1.1 controller!
Can you verify if you have usb-2 driver loaded - if so - unload it, and try again ?
/sbin/lsmod |grep ehci modporbe -r ehci-hcd
Satish
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
As mentioned in an earlier post, I tried lsmod, but only ehci_hcd came up.
Now I tried lspci -v and this is what came up for usb:
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 1a) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 10
I/O ports at d400 [size=32]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (rev 1a) (prog-if 00 [UHCI])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. (Wrong ID) USB Controller
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 10
I/O ports at d800 [size=32]
Capabilities: [80] Power Management version 2
Could the "(Wrong ID)" have anything to do with it? I've noticed when I've compiled kernels for another system that there are 2 possible usb-controller drivers to choose from. VIA and Intel (if I remember correctly). Could it be that for some reason the system gets confused to which of the two drivers to load because of the strange error mentioned above (Wrong ID)?
The following is the complete usb related extract from dmesg:
USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v2.2 uhci_hcd 0000:00:07.2: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:07.2: irq 10, io base 0000d400 SELinux: initialized (dev usbdevfs, type usbdevfs), uses genfs_contexts uhci_hcd 0000:00:07.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1 hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 1-0:1.0: 2 ports detected uhci_hcd 0000:00:07.3: UHCI Host Controller uhci_hcd 0000:00:07.3: irq 10, io base 0000d800 uhci_hcd 0000:00:07.3: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2 hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using address 2 usb 1-2: device not accepting address 2, error -71 usb 1-2: new full speed USB device using address 3 usb 1-2: device not accepting address 3, error -71
From what I can understand from the dmesg extract, the usb 1.1 controller isdetected fine, but it seems like it is the actual usb-disc in question that is the problem?
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance,
Martin S.
