Torsdag 04 november 2004 19:40 skrev Dag Wieers: > Let me add to this that the incompatability of the 3rd party repositories > has nothing to do with the inability or unwillingness of the 3rd party > packagers (to the contrary). But the unwillingness (and policy) of > fedora.us to not allow for compatibility. Apparently it is too hard to > work with the community. > > Kind regards, > -- dag wieers, dag@xxxxxxxxxx, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- That is really interesting. I use rpm http://apt.sw.be fedora/2/en/i386 dag from your repository rpm http://ayo.freshrpms.net fedora/linux/2/i386 core updates freshrpms from freshrpms and rpm ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ fedora/2 stable rpm ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ fedora/all stable rpm ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ kde-redhat/2 stable rpm ftp://apt.us.kde-redhat.org/linux/kde-redhat/apt/ kde-redhat/all stable from kde-redhat. Unitl recently I had no problems, but the last couple of days a little bit. I have normally gotten mplayer from freshrpms, but recently there was an upgrade from your repository. Is that problem free Erik
