Re: Network Card Strangeness

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Allen wrote:
Do you have the appropriate aliases for eth1 and eth2 in /etc/modprobe.conf?

alias eth1 tulip
alias eth2 tulip

Yes - all four NICs have entries:

   alias eth0 tulip
   alias eth1 tulip
   alias eth2 tulip
   alias eth3 sk98lin

Any other ideas why eth1 and eth2 don't load properly ?

What messages appear in /var/log/messages when the tulip module is loaded?

The router should have a separate IP address for each interface, in the IP address range for the segment it is on.

That sparked a lot of discussion in another place, with people agreeing with you and others disagreeing. While some agree that you are right in principle, others say that they have running systems that seem to work quite satisfactorily.

My principle concern is that the machine that is bridging these segments
needs to be known by only one IP address across the whole LAN and that
there is only one DNS on the network, and which is not on this machine
but on the segment that links to the Internet.

In your original email, you said:

  "I have four network cards in an FC2 machine.  This machine is supposed
   to act as a system router between different segments of a LAN, some of
   which is Windows, most of which is Linux, some 10baseT and some 100baseT"

If your machine is to act as a router, you're splitting your LAN into separate subnets and your router will need an IP address in each subnet. Now you're saying it's a bridge, which is an entirely different thing, effectively "glueing" the separate networks into one. You don't need multiple IP addresses for a bridge (you don't actually need *any*).

Try http://bridge.sourceforge.net/howto.html for more details on bridging.

Paul.



[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux