On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 15:21 -0600, Ken Johanson wrote: > Reading this thread you'll see that I've refrained (with delight) from > responding to a whole bunch off non-topic, childish personal insult > posts. Where I draw the line however is being slandered *with* braisen > assertions that I'm wrong, esp when I'm not. But you are. It's been explained 8 ways from Sunday but you refuse to acknowledge the facts. You are chest thumping your opinion as The Truth, and that's not how the community works. Had you made a non-flaming, non-insulting case you might have been taken seriously. But you led with your chin and now are upset because your bell got rung. Might I suggest that you switch to decaf? Really, Ken - isn't there more important stuff you can get worked up over? -- A: Because people read from top to bottom Q: Why is top posting bad? Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT