Am Fr, den 15.10.2004 schrieb Ken Johanson um 17:24: > In regard to original my complaint (ignoring its cause; module > compilation and default header paths), can you explain Redhat's > reasoning for not including the kernel source *in* the distro? -- just > for the sake of argument for someone wanting to do the usual.. slim down > the kernel, or say, build special scsi drivers into the image. etc. The kernel source is included *in* the Fedora Core distribution! > Yet you did also mention that kernel rpm *is* available; is that > included on the main install disks - or would a user have to have > network access, search for it, and check versions (which supposedly dont > always jive from what another post mentioned about 2.6.9 inclusions)? Is > the kernel-rpm placed somewhere on the add-remove app that I just didnt > see (I checked under "development tools")? Poor boy, if your brain would just be a half of your flaming mouth ... Mount FC2 CD3: $ ls -al /mnt/cdrom1/Fedora/RPMS/kernel-source-2.6.5-1.358.i386.rpm -rw-r--r-- 16 root root 45032724 9. Mai 08:15 /mnt/cdrom1/Fedora/RPMS/kernel-source-2.6.5-1.358.i386.rpm In system settings -> add / remove applications -> choose "kernel development" and you get the kernel source from CD. It is just not listed as an option there explicitly because it is obvious from choice that the source is wanted. > -Ken How do I make myself a monkey? I post untruth to a very frequent mailing list and flame a lot showing my lack of investigation. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp Serendipity 17:47:10 up 1 day, 12:58, load average: 0.40, 0.38, 0.31
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
