On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 19:07, Craig White wrote: > the problem with spf is that it is a Microsoft patented technology that > causes a fair amount of concern regarding their commitment and > intentions > > see: > <http://apache.org/foundation/docs/sender-id-position.html> SPF is not Sender-ID. The referenced article is about Sender-ID, not SPF. > of course, there is the opinion that it is ineffective too! > see: > <http://www.ciphertrust.com/spf_stats> Of course. SPF on its own was never going to be an anti-spam solution. http://blogs.zdnet.com/index.php?p=456 Paul. -- Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
