Temlakos wrote: > > (I > wonder whether it's an architectural mismatch--AMD Duron not quite being > an "athlon" or a "686"?), I'm not quite sure what your point is there: I can't see any other mentions of Athlons or i686s, but a Duron is simply an Athlon with less level 2 cache [1]. Architecturally, and from a compatibility point of view, they should be identical, and fully compatible with kernels compiled for "i686" machines. James. [1] OK, it got slower bus speeds than some Athlons... -- E-mail address: james | When the revolution comes, we'll need a longer wall. @westexe.demon.co.uk | -- Tom De Mulder
