Filippos Klironomos wrote: > something that I am curious about. I had installed PINE on my RH9 > system and noticed that it didn't survive the FC2 upgrade. Is there a > specific reason for that? Others have mentioned the license issue. This is actually a serious problem, as I understand it, because "standard" Pine won't handle UTF-8 encoded messages gracefully. These are becoming a lot more common. The license issues mean that UTF-8 can't be included in distributed binaries. James. -- E-mail address: james | One team ... should ask questions in order to find @westexe.demon.co.uk | out [what their delusion is]. The audience can | indicate when they're getting warm by removing their | jackets. -- "I'm Sorry I Haven't A Clue"