On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Nifty Hat Mitch wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 08:53:25PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > Am Fr, den 24.09.2004 schrieb Filippos Klironomos um 20:43: > > > > > something that I am curious about. I had installed PINE on my RH9 > > > system and noticed that it didn't survive the FC2 upgrade. Is there a > > > specific reason for that? > > > > Yes, license issues. > ... > > Dag Wieers' repository has a pine package for Fedora. > > Save one level of indirection and use the RPMs from > the university of Washington, the home of pine. > > They have FC2 rpms. No they don't. From http://www.washington.edu/pine/getpine/linux.html --- RedHat/Fedora RPM package built on Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 --- The Dag-pine rpms are good for Fedora. And the default configs for pine are pretty good here. Satish
