On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 08:53:25PM +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am Fr, den 24.09.2004 schrieb Filippos Klironomos um 20:43: > > > something that I am curious about. I had installed PINE on my RH9 > > system and noticed that it didn't survive the FC2 upgrade. Is there a > > specific reason for that? > > Yes, license issues. ... > Dag Wieers' repository has a pine package for Fedora. Save one level of indirection and use the RPMs from the university of Washington, the home of pine. They have FC2 rpms. -- T o m M i t c h e l l Me, I would "Rather" Not.
