Am Mo, den 13.09.2004 schrieb Alexander Dalloz um 3:06: > "AUTH failure (LOGIN): no mechanism available (-4) SASL(-4): no > mechanism available: checkpass failed" You must lack something. I have to correct myself for the following: > I feel that is nothing cryptic (like error messages on Win32 commonly > are). It is SASL saying "no mechanism available". > The short form: > - with pwcheck_method:auxprop you can do DIGEST-MD5, CRAM-MD5 and PLAIN LOGIN is possible too. You need a proof? $ telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 220 bartleby.dogma.lan ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.1/8.13.1; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 22:56:30 +0200 ehlo localhost 250-bartleby.dogma.lan Hello localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1], pleased to meet you 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250-PIPELINING 250-8BITMIME 250-SIZE 250-DSN 250-ETRN 250-AUTH DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN PLAIN 250-DELIVERBY 250 HELP AUTH LOGIN 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6 bG9raUBkb2dtYS5sYW4= 334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6 dGVzdA== 235 2.0.0 OK Authenticated quit 221 2.0.0 bartleby.dogma.lan closing connection Connection closed by foreign host. I first was tricked because nowhere in documentation I found that it is needed to escape the @ in user@realm in the form user\@realm. So with the properly base64 encoded strings LOGIN auth successes, using auxprop and sasldb2. Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG key 1024D/ED695653 1999-07-13 Fedora GNU/Linux Core 2 (Tettnang) kernel 2.6.8-1.521smp Serendipity 22:19:40 up 15 days, 19:36, load average: 0.91, 0.62, 0.59
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
